PSIA Alpine Level I Certification
Entry-level alpine certification qualifying instructors to teach beginner skiers on easy terrain. Typically recognized only within the US.
Quick facts
- Issuing body
- Professional Ski Instructors of America / American Association of Snowboard Instructors
- Discipline
- Alpine skiing
- Level / Tier
- 1 of 4
- ISIA Stamp
- No
- ISIA Card
- No
- Teach internationally
- Limited
- Restrictions
- Beginner zone only; primarily recognized in US
Certification pathway
The PSIA-AASI alpine skiing progression ladder.
Official courses & pricing
Published programme lines that award or prepare for this qualification. Figures are indicative — confirm on the association site.
PSIA Alpine Level I
Enrolment: Current PSIA-AASI instructor membership; complete required Level I e-learning for your discipline before the on-snow assessment; register via your division event calendar (https://thesnowpros.org/regions/ )—each division publishes its own event pricing (Intermountain figures here are one illustration). Required Level I e-learning, optional school or regional training, then a two-day on-snow certification assessment. For current PSIA-AASI instructor members.
- USD 275 — Level I alpine two-day assessment (PSIA-AASI Intermountain 2025–26, illustrative) — Other divisions publish different event prices. Membership, prep events, and e-learning may cost extra. Verified 2026-04-03 ↗
- USD 460 — Level 1 Foundations Alpine prep clinic, 2-day (Intermountain 2025–26, optional) — Optional prep before the two-day Level I exam; same division fee schedule. Compare other divisions via https://thesnowpros.org/regions/ . Verified 2026-04-04 ↗
Is PSIA Level I right for you?
Use the free Pathway Tool to get a personalised recommendation based on your passport, current certs, and target countries.
Find your pathway →Always verify requirements with Professional Ski Instructors of America / American Association of Snowboard Instructors before committing to a course or career change. Official source ↗
See something wrong? Suggest a correction